Constellation, Spacedust, Slingshot, UFOs: atproto crates and services for microcosm

Convert existing REST /links/distinct-dids endpoint to XRPC equivalent #8 #9

merged opened by seoul.systems targeting main from seoul.systems/microcosm-rs: xrpc_get_distinct

Simple conversion of the existing endpoint from REST to XRPC. Consecutively marked the pre-existing REST endpoint as deprecated.

Labels

None yet.

Participants 3
AT URI
at://did:plc:53wellrw53o7sw4zlpfenvuh/sh.tangled.repo.pull/3mcysjpzwwp22
+212 -17
Diff #5
+79
constellation/src/server/mod.rs
··· 136 136 }), 137 137 ) 138 138 .route( 139 + // deprecated 139 140 "/links", 140 141 get({ 141 142 let store = store.clone(); ··· 147 148 }), 148 149 ) 149 150 .route( 151 + "/xrpc/blue.microcosm.links.getBacklinkDids", 152 + get({ 153 + let store = store.clone(); 154 + move |accept, query| async { 155 + spawn_blocking(|| get_backlink_dids(accept, query, store)) 156 + .await 157 + .map_err(to500)? 158 + } 159 + }), 160 + ) 161 + // deprecated 162 + .route( 150 163 "/links/distinct-dids", 151 164 get({ 152 165 let store = store.clone(); ··· 169 182 } 170 183 }), 171 184 ) 185 + // deprecated 172 186 .route( 173 187 "/links/all", 174 188 get({ ··· 776 790 accept, 777 791 GetManyToManyItemsResponse { 778 792 items, 793 + cursor, 794 + query: (*query).clone(), 795 + }, 796 + )) 797 + } 798 + 799 + #[derive(Clone, Deserialize)] 800 + struct GetBacklinkDidsQuery { 801 + subject: String, 802 + source: String, 803 + cursor: Option<OpaqueApiCursor>, 804 + limit: Option<u64>, 805 + // TODO: allow reverse (er, forward) order as well 806 + } 807 + #[derive(Template, Serialize)] 808 + #[template(path = "get-backlink-dids.html.j2")] 809 + struct GetBacklinkDidsResponse { 810 + // what does staleness mean? 811 + // - new links have appeared. would be nice to offer a `since` cursor to fetch these. and/or, 812 + // - links have been deleted. hmm. 813 + total: u64, 814 + linking_dids: Vec<Did>, 815 + cursor: Option<OpaqueApiCursor>, 816 + #[serde(skip_serializing)] 817 + query: GetBacklinkDidsQuery, 818 + } 819 + fn get_backlink_dids( 820 + accept: ExtractAccept, 821 + query: Query<GetBacklinkDidsQuery>, 822 + store: impl LinkReader, 823 + ) -> Result<impl IntoResponse, http::StatusCode> { 824 + let until = query 825 + .cursor 826 + .clone() 827 + .map(|oc| ApiCursor::try_from(oc).map_err(|_| http::StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST)) 828 + .transpose()? 829 + .map(|c| c.next); 830 + 831 + let limit = query.limit.unwrap_or(DEFAULT_CURSOR_LIMIT); 832 + if limit > DEFAULT_CURSOR_LIMIT_MAX { 833 + return Err(http::StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST); 834 + } 835 + 836 + let Some((collection, path)) = query.source.split_once(':') else { 837 + return Err(http::StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST); 838 + }; 839 + let path = format!(".{path}"); 840 + 841 + let paged = store 842 + .get_distinct_dids(&query.subject, collection, &path, limit, until) 843 + .map_err(|_| http::StatusCode::INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)?; 844 + 845 + let cursor = paged.next.map(|next| { 846 + ApiCursor { 847 + version: paged.version, 848 + next, 849 + } 850 + .into() 851 + }); 852 + 853 + Ok(acceptable( 854 + accept, 855 + GetBacklinkDidsResponse { 856 + total: paged.total, 857 + linking_dids: paged.items, 779 858 cursor, 780 859 query: (*query).clone(), 781 860 },
+2 -2
constellation/src/storage/mem_store.rs
··· 507 507 ) -> Result<HashMap<String, HashMap<String, CountsByCount>>> { 508 508 let data = self.0.lock().unwrap(); 509 509 let mut out: HashMap<String, HashMap<String, CountsByCount>> = HashMap::new(); 510 - if let Some(asdf) = data.targets.get(&Target::new(target)) { 511 - for (Source { collection, path }, linkers) in asdf { 510 + if let Some(source_linker_pairs) = data.targets.get(&Target::new(target)) { 511 + for (Source { collection, path }, linkers) in source_linker_pairs { 512 512 let records = linkers.iter().flatten().count() as u64; 513 513 let distinct_dids = linkers 514 514 .iter()
+15 -2
constellation/templates/hello.html.j2
··· 82 82 25, 83 83 ) %} 84 84 85 - 86 85 <h3 class="route"><code>GET /xrpc/blue.microcosm.links.getManyToMany</code></h3> 87 86 88 87 <p>A list of many-to-many join records linking to a target and a secondary target.</p> ··· 101 100 <p style="margin-bottom: 0"><strong>Try it:</strong></p> 102 101 {% call try_it::get_many_to_many("at://did:plc:a4pqq234yw7fqbddawjo7y35/app.bsky.feed.post/3m237ilwc372e", "app.bsky.feed.like:subject.uri", "reply.parent.uri", [""], [""], 16) %} 103 102 103 + <h3 class="route"><code>GET /xrpc/blue.microcosm.links.getDistinct</code></h3> 104 + 105 + <p>A list of distinct DIDs (identities) with links to a target.</p> 106 + 107 + <h4>Query parameters:</h4> 108 + 109 + <ul> 110 + <li><code>subject</code>: required, must url-encode. The target being linked to. Example: <code>did:plc:vc7f4oafdgxsihk4cry2xpze</code> or <code>at://did:plc:vc7f4oafdgxsihk4cry2xpze/app.bsky.feed.post/3lgwdn7vd722r</code></li> 111 + <li><code>source</code>: required. Collection and path specification for the primary link. Example: <code>app.bsky.feed.like:subject.uri</code></li> 112 + <li><code>limit</code>: optional. Number of results to return. Default: <code>16</code>. Maximum: <code>100</code></li> 113 + <li><code>cursor</code>: optional, see Definitions.</li> 114 + </ul> 115 + 116 + <p style="margin-bottom: 0"><strong>Try it:</strong></p> 117 + {% call try_it::get_backlink_dids("at://did:plc:vc7f4oafdgxsihk4cry2xpze/app.bsky.feed.post/3lgwdn7vd722r", "app.bsky.feed.like:subject.uri") %} 104 118 105 119 <h3 class="route"><code>GET /links</code></h3> 106 120 ··· 122 136 123 137 <p style="margin-bottom: 0"><strong>Try it:</strong></p> 124 138 {% call try_it::links("at://did:plc:a4pqq234yw7fqbddawjo7y35/app.bsky.feed.post/3m237ilwc372e", "app.bsky.feed.like", ".subject.uri", [""], 16) %} 125 - 126 139 127 140 <h3 class="route"><code>GET /links/distinct-dids</code></h3> 128 141
+8
constellation/templates/try-it-macros.html.j2
··· 142 142 </form> 143 143 {% endmacro %} 144 144 145 + {% macro get_backlink_dids(subject, source) %} 146 + <form method="get" action="/xrpc/blue.microcosm.links.getBacklinkDids"> 147 + <pre class="code"><strong>GET</strong> /xrpc/blue.microcosm.links.getBacklinkDids 148 + ?subject= <input type="text" name="subject" value="{{ subject }}" placeholder="subject" /> 149 + &source= <input type="text" name="source" value="{{ source }}" placeholder="source" /> <button type="submit">get links</button></pre> 150 + </form> 151 + {% endmacro %} 152 + 145 153 {% macro links_count(target, collection, path) %} 146 154 <form method="get" action="/links/count"> 147 155 <pre class="code"><strong>GET</strong> /links/count
+56
lexicons/blue.microcosm/links/getBacklinkDids.json
··· 1 + { 2 + "lexicon": 1, 3 + "id": "blue.microcosm.links.getBacklinkDids", 4 + "defs": { 5 + "main": { 6 + "type": "query", 7 + "description": "a list of distinct dids with a specific records linking to a target at a specified path", 8 + "parameters": { 9 + "type": "params", 10 + "required": ["subject", "source"], 11 + "properties": { 12 + "subject": { 13 + "type": "string", 14 + "format": "uri", 15 + "description": "the target being linked to (at-uri, did, or uri)" 16 + }, 17 + "source": { 18 + "type": "string", 19 + "description": "collection and path specification (e.g., 'app.bsky.feed.like:subject.uri')" 20 + }, 21 + "limit": { 22 + "type": "integer", 23 + "minimum": 1, 24 + "maximum": 100, 25 + "default": 16, 26 + "description": "number of results to return" 27 + } 28 + } 29 + }, 30 + "output": { 31 + "encoding": "application/json", 32 + "schema": { 33 + "type": "object", 34 + "required": ["total", "linking_dids"], 35 + "properties": { 36 + "total": { 37 + "type": "integer", 38 + "description": "total number of matching links" 39 + }, 40 + "linking_dids": { 41 + "type": "array", 42 + "items": { 43 + "type": "string", 44 + "format": "did" 45 + } 46 + }, 47 + "cursor": { 48 + "type": "string", 49 + "description": "pagination cursor" 50 + } 51 + } 52 + } 53 + } 54 + } 55 + } 56 + }
+3 -13
lexicons/blue.microcosm/links/getBacklinks.json
··· 7 7 "description": "a list of records linking to any record, identity, or uri", 8 8 "parameters": { 9 9 "type": "params", 10 - "required": [ 11 - "subject", 12 - "source" 13 - ], 10 + "required": ["subject", "source"], 14 11 "properties": { 15 12 "subject": { 16 13 "type": "string", ··· 42 39 "encoding": "application/json", 43 40 "schema": { 44 41 "type": "object", 45 - "required": [ 46 - "total", 47 - "records" 48 - ], 42 + "required": ["total", "records"], 49 43 "properties": { 50 44 "total": { 51 45 "type": "integer", ··· 68 62 }, 69 63 "linkRecord": { 70 64 "type": "object", 71 - "required": [ 72 - "did", 73 - "collection", 74 - "rkey" 75 - ], 65 + "required": ["did", "collection", "rkey"], 76 66 "properties": { 77 67 "did": { 78 68 "type": "string",

History

6 rounds 17 comments
sign up or login to add to the discussion
4 commits
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
Rename method name to fetch backlink DIDs
Address fig's comments
Fix botched merge conflict (2d97b62) resolution
expand 0 comments
pull request successfully merged
3 commits
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
Rename method name to fetch backlink DIDs
Address fig's comments
expand 3 comments

managed to get it conflicting again after merging #7, sorry! i'm good to go with this otherwise.

i'll let you resolve and resubmit, so it says "merged" on your pr in tangled if you want. realized it wasn't doing that when i was merging manually otherwise.

(but i'm happy to resolve conflicts and merge that way if it's the same to you or if you don't have time to get the changes!)

I resolved the conflict and now things should be ready to merge again

2 commits
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
Rename method name to fetch backlink DIDs
expand 3 comments

sorry for getting the PRs mixed up! i'll do a final pass on this tomorrow, it's looking great. two clippy lints (from make check in the repo root):

  1. #[deprecated]: please put a comment instead of using the rust-level marker (which is very cool!). the deprecations in the server code are mostly notices to client using, not internal code (like the web server) :)

  2. unnecessary & on line 728 for the &collection param (just remove the &).

(i gotta get tangled CI going here!)

^^ line 728 of server/mod.rs

3 commits
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
Rename method name to fetch backlink DIDs
Replace tabs with spaces in try-it-macros.html.j2
expand 7 comments

git-merge-tree doesn't show any conflicts either. A bit lost what to do tbh

lemme have a closer look at why!

this is an issue on our end, and has been fixed in this PR: https://tangled.org/tangled.org/core/pulls/1033 . I will try to get this merged and deployed shortly, and that should automagically unblock this PR!

Sounds great!

the bug here should be fixed now! the pending conflict is because both files have been modified, sorry for the long wait!

fixed the remaining conflicts and the PR seems good to go now. Thanks for the follow up :)

2 commits
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
Rename method name to fetch backlink DIDs
expand 1 comment

The merge conflict label seems to stem from a whitespace related error even though the patch applies cleanly locally. Asking in the Tangled Discord it seems that should've been just a warning instead?

1 commit
expand
Add getDistinct XRPC equivalent to REST /links/distinct-dids
expand 3 comments

i'm getting a compilation error on this branch from the templates -- i think a couple lines got lost from #8

i think the name of this XRPC needs another iteration. it's close to getBacklinks so the name should probably be closer.

pdsls just calls the distinct dids count "repos", and i'm open to taking some inspiration from that. alksjdflkas i don't have a good suggestion right now.

Sorry for the compilation error. I started basing my own work on the new XRPC count endpoint as a reference. Rebased on main again and verified that the compilation errors are gone now.

Regarding the endpoint name, "Repos" isn't too bad either, but maybe getBacklinkDids is the option that is most self-evident. So I might go with that.

Feel free to merge if you agree. If you don't think that's a good idea, just let me know. :)

i think that's a good name. going to sleep on it before merging.

thanks!