···43 <dd>TBA</dd>
4445 <dt>11. Do you know how to correctly use <dl>?</dt>
46- <dd>TBA</dd>
4748 <dt>12. What is your favourite HTML element?</dt>
49 <dd>TBA<s><marquee></s> Probably <a> or <img></dd>
···69 <dt>19. What do you think of nostalgia-focused or "retro" websites?</dt>
70 <dd>
71 It depends on their content, if it lacks any sort of content and just has a bunch of 88x31 buttons on
72- the index page (kinda like how I did in my Neocities days) then it's just mediocre
73 </dd>
7475 <dt>20. Is your HTML valid? Do you even check?</dt>
76 <dd>
77 The HTML is partially valid. By that I mean there are warnings and notices coming out from the validator
78- but not errors
79 </dd>
8081 <dt>21. What are your opinion on buttons and banners?</dt>
···43 <dd>TBA</dd>
4445 <dt>11. Do you know how to correctly use <dl>?</dt>
46+ <dd>Yes, thanks to this <a href="https://mouseling.net/100webmaster.txt">template</a>!</dd>
4748 <dt>12. What is your favourite HTML element?</dt>
49 <dd>TBA<s><marquee></s> Probably <a> or <img></dd>
···69 <dt>19. What do you think of nostalgia-focused or "retro" websites?</dt>
70 <dd>
71 It depends on their content, if it lacks any sort of content and just has a bunch of 88x31 buttons on
72+ the index page (kinda like how I did in my Neocities days) then it's just mediocre.
73 </dd>
7475 <dt>20. Is your HTML valid? Do you even check?</dt>
76 <dd>
77 The HTML is partially valid. By that I mean there are warnings and notices coming out from the validator
78+ but not errors.
79 </dd>
8081 <dt>21. What are your opinion on buttons and banners?</dt>