Git fork
at reftables-rust 360 lines 14 kB view raw
1git-subtree(1) 2============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees 7 8 9SYNOPSIS 10-------- 11[verse] 12'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] add <local-commit> 13'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] add <repository> <remote-ref> 14'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] merge <local-commit> [<repository>] 15'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] split [<local-commit>] 16 17[verse] 18'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] pull <repository> <remote-ref> 19'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> [-S[<keyid>]] push <repository> <refspec> 20 21DESCRIPTION 22----------- 23Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory 24of the main project, optionally including the subproject's 25entire history. 26 27For example, you could include the source code for a library 28as a subdirectory of your application. 29 30Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for 31the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special 32constructions (like '.gitmodules' files or gitlinks) be present in 33your repository, and do not force end-users of your 34repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees 35work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be 36committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in 37any way you want. 38 39They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge 40strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging 41the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the 42entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it 43into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy 44you can alternate back and forth between these 45two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can 46automatically merge the changes into your project; if you 47update the library inside your project, you can "split" the 48changes back out again and merge them back into the library 49project. 50 51For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being 52useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish 53that as its own git repository, without accidentally 54intermingling the history of your application project. 55 56[TIP] 57In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that 58people split their commits between the subtrees and the main 59project as much as possible. That is, if you make a change that 60affects both the library and the main application, commit it in 61two pieces. That way, when you split the library commits out 62later, their descriptions will still make sense. But if this 63isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*. 'git subtree' will 64simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit 65when it splits it out into the subproject later. 66 67 68COMMANDS 69-------- 70add <local-commit>:: 71add <repository> <remote-ref>:: 72 Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents 73 from the given <local-commit> or <repository> and <remote-ref>. 74 A new commit is created automatically, joining the imported 75 project's history with your own. With '--squash', import 76 only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its 77 entire history. 78 79merge <local-commit> [<repository>]:: 80 Merge recent changes up to <local-commit> into the <prefix> 81 subtree. As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't 82 remove your own local changes; it just merges those 83 changes into the latest <local-commit>. With '--squash', 84 create only one commit that contains all the changes, 85 rather than merging in the entire history. 86+ 87If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't always have to be 88forward; you can use this command to go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4, 89for example. If your merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in 90the usual ways. 91+ 92When using '--squash', and the previous merge with '--squash' merged an 93annotated tag of the subtree repository, that tag needs to be available locally. 94If <repository> is given, a missing tag will automatically be fetched from that 95repository. 96 97split [<local-commit>] [<repository>]:: 98 Extract a new, synthetic project history from the 99 history of the <prefix> subtree of <local-commit>, or of 100 HEAD if no <local-commit> is given. The new history 101 includes only the commits (including merges) that 102 affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the 103 contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead 104 of in a subdirectory. Thus, the newly created history 105 is suitable for export as a separate git repository. 106+ 107After splitting successfully, a single commit ID is printed to stdout. 108This corresponds to the HEAD of the newly created tree, which you can 109manipulate however you want. 110+ 111Repeated splits of exactly the same history are guaranteed to be 112identical (i.e. to produce the same commit IDs) as long as the 113settings passed to 'split' (such as '--annotate') are the same. 114Because of this, if you add new commits and then re-split, the new 115commits will be attached as commits on top of the history you 116generated last time, so 'git merge' and friends will work as expected. 117+ 118When a previous merge with '--squash' merged an annotated tag of the 119subtree repository, that tag needs to be available locally. 120If <repository> is given, a missing tag will automatically be fetched from that 121repository. 122 123pull <repository> <remote-ref>:: 124 Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that 125 it fetches the given ref from the specified remote 126 repository. 127 128push <repository> [+][<local-commit>:]<remote-ref>:: 129 Does a 'split' using the <prefix> subtree of <local-commit> 130 and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the 131 <repository> and <remote-ref>. This can be used to push your 132 subtree to different branches of the remote repository. Just 133 as with 'split', if no <local-commit> is given, then HEAD is 134 used. The optional leading '+' is ignored. 135 136OPTIONS FOR ALL COMMANDS 137------------------------ 138-q:: 139--quiet:: 140 Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr. 141 142-d:: 143--debug:: 144 Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr. 145 146-P <prefix>:: 147--prefix=<prefix>:: 148 Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you 149 want to manipulate. This option is mandatory 150 for all commands. 151 152-S[<keyid>]:: 153--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]:: 154--no-gpg-sign:: 155 GPG-sign commits. The `keyid` argument is optional and 156 defaults to the committer identity; `--no-gpg-sign` is useful to 157 countermand a `--gpg-sign` option given earlier on the command line. 158 159OPTIONS FOR 'add' AND 'merge' (ALSO: 'pull', 'split --rejoin', AND 'push --rejoin') 160----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161These options for 'add' and 'merge' may also be given to 'pull' (which 162wraps 'merge'), 'split --rejoin' (which wraps either 'add' or 'merge' 163as appropriate), and 'push --rejoin' (which wraps 'split --rejoin'). 164 165--squash:: 166 Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree project, produce 167 only a single commit that contains all the differences you want to 168 merge, and then merge that new commit into your project. 169+ 170Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People rarely want to see 171every change that happened between v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're 172using, since none of the interim versions were ever included in their 173application. 174+ 175Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same subproject is 176included multiple times in the same project, or is removed and then 177re-added. In such a case, it doesn't make sense to combine the 178histories anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history belongs 179to which subtree. 180+ 181Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and forth between 182different versions of a subtree, rather than strictly forward. 'git 183subtree merge --squash' always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly 184specified commit, even if getting to that commit would require undoing 185some changes that were added earlier. 186+ 187Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your local repository 188remain intact and can be later split and send upstream to the 189subproject. 190 191-m <message>:: 192--message=<message>:: 193 Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit. 194 195OPTIONS FOR 'split' (ALSO: 'push') 196---------------------------------- 197These options for 'split' may also be given to 'push' (which wraps 198'split'). 199 200--annotate=<annotation>:: 201 When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a prefix to each 202 commit message. Since we're creating new commits with the same commit 203 message, but possibly different content, from the original commits, this 204 can help to differentiate them and avoid confusion. 205+ 206Whenever you split, you need to use the same <annotation>, or else you 207don't have a guarantee that the new re-created history will be identical 208to the old one. That will prevent merging from working correctly. git 209subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly if you use '--rejoin', 210but it may not always be effective. 211 212-b <branch>:: 213--branch=<branch>:: 214 After generating the synthetic history, create a new branch called 215 <branch> that contains the new history. This is suitable for immediate 216 pushing upstream. <branch> must not already exist. 217 218--ignore-joins:: 219 If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize its history 220 reconstruction to generate only the new commits since the last 221 '--rejoin'. '--ignore-joins' disables this behavior, forcing it to 222 regenerate the entire history. In a large project, this can take a long 223 time. 224 225--onto=<onto>:: 226 If your subtree was originally imported using something other than git 227 subtree, its history may not match what git subtree is expecting. In 228 that case, you can specify the commit ID <onto> that corresponds to the 229 first revision of the subproject's history that was imported into your 230 project, and git subtree will attempt to build its history from there. 231+ 232If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need this option. 233 234--rejoin:: 235 After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic history back into 236 your main project. That way, future splits can search only the part of 237 history that has been added since the most recent '--rejoin'. 238+ 239If your split commits end up merged into the upstream subproject, and 240then you want to get the latest upstream version, this will allow git's 241merge algorithm to more intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows 242these synthetic commits are already part of the upstream repository). 243+ 244Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' showing an extra 245copy of every new commit that was created (the original, and the 246synthetic one). 247+ 248If you do all your merges with '--squash', make sure you also use 249'--squash' when you 'split --rejoin'. 250 251 252EXAMPLE 1. 'add' command 253------------------------ 254Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like 255to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the 256git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing 257git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/: 258 259 $ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \ 260 git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master 261 262'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch 263name 264 265You can omit the '--squash' flag, but doing so will increase the number 266of commits that are included in your local repository. 267 268We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code 269from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git 270in our git-extensions repository. 271 272EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using 'commit', 'merge' and 'pull' 273--------------------------------------------------------------- 274Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example. 275First, get your own copy of the git.git repository: 276 277 $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git 278 $ cd test-git 279 280gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit 2810a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately. 282But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to 283extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with 284the upstream. You could do this: 285 286 $ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \ 287 0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \ 288 --branch gitweb-latest 289 $ gitk gitweb-latest 290 $ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master 291 292(We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from 2930a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.") 294 295If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or 296a previous split had already been done with '--rejoin' specified) 297then you can do all your splits without having to remember any 298weird commit IDs: 299 300 $ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \ 301 --branch gitweb-latest2 302 303And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just 304as easily: 305 306 $ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \ 307 git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master 308 309Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier 310version of gitweb: 311 312 $ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10 313 314Then make some changes: 315 316 $ date >gitweb/myfile 317 $ git add gitweb/myfile 318 $ git commit -m 'created myfile' 319 320And fast forward again: 321 322 $ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest 323 324And notice that your change is still intact: 325 326 $ ls -l gitweb/myfile 327 328And you can split it out and look at your changes versus 329the standard gitweb: 330 331 git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb) 332 333EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using a branch 334------------------------------------------- 335Suppose you have a source directory with many files and 336subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own 337git project. Here's a short way to do it: 338 339First, make the new repository wherever you want: 340 341 $ <go to the new location> 342 $ git init --bare 343 344Back in your original directory: 345 346 $ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split 347 348Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository: 349 350 $ git push <new-repo> split:master 351 352 353AUTHOR 354------ 355Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> 356 357 358GIT 359--- 360Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite